Logo
Research
Conviction list
Services
Sign Up
Log In
Upgrade
Search

Definitions & Metholodgy


Rating Definitions

  • Outperform – We expect the stock to deliver a total return above the median of our coverage universe over the next 12–24 months. Our view reflects a favorable risk/reward balance with identifiable upside drivers and a clear margin of safety in valuation.

  • Neutral – We expect the stock’s total return to be broadly in line with the median of our coverage universe over the next 12–24 months. The current valuation implies a balanced risk-reward setup, where a limited margin of safety offsets the upside.

  • Underperform – We expect the stock to deliver a total return below the median of our coverage universe over the next 12–24 months. Our view reflects an unfavorable risk/reward profile, where valuation leaves little or no margin of safety and downside risks outweigh potential catalysts for upside.


Valuation Methodology Disclosure

Our price targets are derived from fundamental forecasts (revenues, EBIT, free cash flow, and Owner Earnings) and relative valuation frameworks such as EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDA. In select cases, we apply sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) or adjusted cash flow analyses to reflect the company's structure and key catalysts.

A margin of safety is required for an Outperform rating. Unless otherwise noted, our valuation horizon is 12–24 months, consistent with our rating framework. We also highlight implied multiples at our target prices, allowing investors to compare across peers.

Our price targets are derived from fundamental forecasts (revenues, EBIT, free cash flow, and Owner Earnings) and relative valuation frameworks such as EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDA. In select cases, we apply sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) or adjusted cash flow analyses to reflect the company's structure and key catalysts.

A margin of safety is required for an Outperform rating. Unless otherwise noted, our valuation horizon is 12–24 months, consistent with our rating framework. We also highlight implied multiples at our target prices, allowing investors to compare across peers.


Risks to the Thesis

Our investment views are subject to risks that may materially impact performance and valuation. These include:

  • Execution risk: Delivery on strategic, growth, and profitability targets.

  • Competitive dynamics: Market share pressure, pricing, or disruptive entrants.

  • Financial performance: Variability in revenues, EBIT margins, or cash generation.

  • Regulatory and macro risks: Changes in regulation, interest rates, or economic conditions.

  • Company-specific risks: Governance, ownership, or contingent liabilities.


A reassessment of these risks could alter our view of the stock’s risk/reward profile and the associated margin of safety.


Confidence Levels

Each company we cover is assigned a Confidence Level — High, Medium, or Low — which reflects the visibility, predictability, and clarity of the catalyst in our analysis.

  • High Confidence: We have strong visibility into fundamentals, reliable performance data, and identifiable catalysts. The company’s risk-reward profile is well-defined, and the valuation includes a clear margin of safety.

  • Medium Confidence: We have reasonable forecast visibility, but certain factors such as execution, competition, or market conditions introduce moderate uncertainty.

  • Low Confidence: Limited visibility or binary outcomes make forecasts less predictable. These cases may still offer upside, but with higher risk and limited margin of safety.


The Confidence Level helps investors interpret the strength and reliability behind each rating, complementing our focus on risk-reward balance and margin of safety across the research universe.


Independence & Coverage Model

Investor subscriptions primarily fund Lind Research.

We initiate and maintain coverage of companies as part of our research universe regardless of issuer payments.

Issuers may choose to sponsor distribution of our research to a wider audience, but compensation does not influence ratings, price targets, or conclusions.

Coverage continues even if an issuer ends a distribution agreement, as premium subscriptions support costs.

This structure ensures our research remains independent, credible, and investor-focused while also allowing companies to benefit from broader visibility.


Contact Us

If you have any questions, please get in touch with us at: 📧 [email protected]

Lind Research

Home

Subscribe

Upgrade

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Research

Company universe

Conviction list

Services

Definitions

Portal

© 2025 Lind Capital Holding AB.

Privacy policy

Terms of use

Powered by beehiiv